Phone: (03) 9563 4688

Email: office@aubreypaton.com.au

Address: 17D Chester Street, Oakleigh VIC 3166

Latest Accounting News
Hot Issues
September update of latest COVID-19 initiatives.
ATO JobKeeper 2.0 guidance surfaces
Expats Return to Australia – Travel Expenses
Profession to be relied on for post-JobKeeper turnover certificates
Update of Superannuation contribution rules from July 1, 2020
Expats & COVID-19 Impacts on tax residency
Economic recovery could be slower than anticipated: RBA
High Court rules in favour of employers on personal leave accruals
JobKeeper Phase 2 - Latest Update
Payroll Tax 2020 concessions and JobKeeper
High alert issued over myGov tax time scam
Extended director penalty regime to catch out ‘zombie companies’
SG amnesty deadline - 7 September
‘Hundreds’ to be contacted in ATO early super compliance blitz
90,000 SMEs to benefit from new JobTrainer program
Work Related expenses – 2020
‘Everyone is now on notice’: ATO acquires COVID-19 data on 3m Aussies
Extra Tools & Resources for our clients.
Year End Tax Deductions – “equipment”
Home Office Claims 2020
Early release of super sees ‘high take-up’
Tax time 2020: ATO homes in on rental deduction claims
ATO announces Div 7A COVID-19 assistance
‘HomeBuilder’ grants now available.
Articles archive
Quarter 2 April - June 2020
Quarter 1 January - March 2020
Quarter 4 October - December 2019
Quarter 3 July - September 2019
Quarter 2 April - June 2019
Quarter 1 January - March 2019
Quarter 4 October - December 2018
Quarter 3 July - September 2018
Quarter 2 April - June 2018
Quarter 1 January - March 2018
Quarter 4 October - December 2017
Quarter 3 July - September 2017
Quarter 2 April - June 2017
Quarter 1 January - March 2017
Quarter 4 October - December 2016
Quarter 3 July - September 2016
Quarter 2 April - June 2016
Quarter 1 January - March 2016
Quarter 4 October - December 2015
Quarter 3 July - September 2015
Quarter 2 April - June 2015
Quarter 1 January - March 2015
Quarter 4 October - December 2014
Quarter 3 July - September 2014
Quarter 2 April - June 2014
Quarter 1 January - March 2014
Quarter 4 October - December 2013
Quarter 3 July - September 2013
Quarter 2 April - June 2013
Quarter 1 January - March 2013
Quarter 4 October - December 2012
Quarter 3 July - September 2012
Quarter 2 April - June 2012
Quarter 1 January - March 2012
Quarter 4 October - December 2011
Quarter 3 July - September 2011
Quarter 2 April - June 2011
Quarter 1 January - March 2011
Quarter 4 October - December 2010
Quarter 3 July - September 2010
Quarter 2 April - June 2010
Quarter 1 January - March 2010
Quarter 4 October - December 2009
Quarter 3 July - September 2009
Quarter 2 April - June 2009
Quarter 1 January - March 2009
Quarter 4 October - December 2008
Quarter 3 July - September 2008
Quarter 2 April - June 2008
Quarter 1 January - March 2008
Quarter 4 October - December 2007
Quarter 2 April - June 2007
Quarter 1 January - March 2007
Quarter 2 April - June 2006
Quarter 1 January - March 2006
Quarter 4 October - December 2005
Quarter 3 July - September 2005
‘Hundreds’ to be contacted in ATO early super compliance blitz

 

Hundreds of Australians who applied for the COVID-19 early release of superannuation are set to be queried on their eligibility as the ATO kicks off a pilot compliance program.

 



       


The ATO will now contact “hundreds” of people who appear to have been ineligible for the early release of super but have gone ahead to raid their retirement savings.


The pilot examination will see 130 ATO officers personally contacting people to confirm and prove they have met the eligibility requirements, including by having been made redundant or seeing their working hours reduced by 20 per cent or more.


The initial examination will help the ATO decide if it will need to design a broader compliance program.


“For example, just to make it real, if we write out to 500 people and it turns out that 490 of them were eligible and only 10 were ineligible, we might say, ‘Well, look, the level of ineligibility is so low it’s not worth doing a big compliance program’,” ATO second commissioner Jeremy Hirschhorn told a Senate committee.


“Conversely, we might write out to 500 people and find out that 200 were ineligible, but we’ve worked out a signal to clearly identify those people, and then we’ll do a broader program.”


Mr Hirschhorn said data matching from external sources, including Services Australia, would help it identify those who were ineligible, but admitted that there would be holes in its information.


“We have information from systems in relation to things like how much people have been paid under Single Touch Payroll or whether they are in continued employment and whatnot,” he said.


“That information is informative but not determinative in relation to eligibility.


“For example, one of the tests is based on hours, it’s not based on remuneration. There are various tests on why you can be eligible. We have information which gives us hints that somebody may not be eligible, but it doesn’t tell us that they’re not eligible.”


ATO defends application process


The Treasury now expects $41.9 billion to be removed from the super system following the extension of the scheme to December, with $31.9 billion withdrawn as of 28 July.


Mr Hirschhorn said the scheme was designed on a self-assessment system, and a compliance program could not be enforced at the time of application because the ATO would not have live information of a person’s circumstances.


“It’s based on self-assessment. We work on the assumption that Australians are honest,” Mr Hirschhorn said.


“This is about getting emergency money to people. So, we will never have enough information to reject quickly. We will give people their money on the basis of their say-so.


“We don’t know yet whether, for example, they’ve been terminated, they’ve lost their job. We don’t know at the time they apply. We might have reasonable information a month later, when the next Single Touch Payroll comes in. So, that’s why it’s based on self-assessment.”


Mr Hirschhorn also noted that the ATO has yet to issue any fines or revoke the determination on a person’s eligibility and require the withdrawn super amount to be included as assessable income.


“There are a range of consequences. Again, where we think somebody has made an honest mistake as to their eligibility, and particularly where they voluntarily disclose that to us, we are unlikely to impose significant consequences,” he said.


“The next phase is if we withdraw our declaration, so they will have to pay tax on their superannuation at their marginal tax rate, and that is a reasonably significant consequence for many.


“In the worst cases, we can impose penalties for misleading statements, and that is up to $12,600, which is a very significant penalty when you have withdrawn $10,000 of your own money from super. So, there are a range of consequences, but again, we moderate those consequences depending on the deliberateness of the action.”


 


 


Jotham Lian 
02 August 2020 
accountantsdaily.com.au


 




11th-August-2020