Phone: (03) 9563 4688

Email: office@aubreypaton.com.au

Address: 17D Chester Street, Oakleigh VIC 3166

Latest Accounting News
Hot Issues
Covid-19 resources.
Historic $130bn wage subsidy to cover 6 million workers
Stage 2 – Covid-19 stimulus package.
Covid-19 Update - Small Business
PM launches $17.6 billion virus stimulus plan
SG amnesty bill passes Parliament
ATO flags most common SMSF return mistakes
Expected GDP by country 2010 to 2100
ATO expands small business review pilot
A resource hub for our clients.
Risks when dating documents in 2020
Australian Taxation Office (ATO) debts may affect your credit rating
Statistical picture of Australia - Update
Absentee Property Owner – Tax Whack - Victoria
Debate heats up around $10k cash ban bill
There’s still time to move to Single Touch Payroll (STP)
Real Time World Population Growth - Wow!!
ATO audits continue to target Lifestyle assets
Property deduction errors down to ‘lack of understanding’: ATO
Data can be great stuff! - Australia
GST refunds for returned imported goods
14k employers, $230m in super: Financial Services Minister defends proposed SG amnesty
Bushfires 2019–20 (ATO)
Accounting profession responds to bushfire crisis
Helping your business survive a natural disaster - ATO
Single Touch Payroll (STP) – now ensure super is paid on time.
Beware of Australian Taxation Office (ATO) impersonation scams
Australia by the Numbers
‘Visible, valued and owned’: ATO outlines super priorities for new year
Introductory Rates & Interest Free Periods
Articles archive
Quarter 4 October - December 2019
Quarter 3 July - September 2019
Quarter 2 April - June 2019
Quarter 1 January - March 2019
Quarter 4 October - December 2018
Quarter 3 July - September 2018
Quarter 2 April - June 2018
Quarter 1 January - March 2018
Quarter 4 October - December 2017
Quarter 3 July - September 2017
Quarter 2 April - June 2017
Quarter 1 January - March 2017
Quarter 4 October - December 2016
Quarter 3 July - September 2016
Quarter 2 April - June 2016
Quarter 1 January - March 2016
Quarter 4 October - December 2015
Quarter 3 July - September 2015
Quarter 2 April - June 2015
Quarter 1 January - March 2015
Quarter 4 October - December 2014
Quarter 3 July - September 2014
Quarter 2 April - June 2014
Quarter 1 January - March 2014
Quarter 4 October - December 2013
Quarter 3 July - September 2013
Quarter 2 April - June 2013
Quarter 1 January - March 2013
Quarter 4 October - December 2012
Quarter 3 July - September 2012
Quarter 2 April - June 2012
Quarter 1 January - March 2012
Quarter 4 October - December 2011
Quarter 3 July - September 2011
Quarter 2 April - June 2011
Quarter 1 January - March 2011
Quarter 4 October - December 2010
Quarter 3 July - September 2010
Quarter 2 April - June 2010
Quarter 1 January - March 2010
Quarter 4 October - December 2009
Quarter 3 July - September 2009
Quarter 2 April - June 2009
Quarter 1 January - March 2009
Quarter 4 October - December 2008
Quarter 3 July - September 2008
Quarter 2 April - June 2008
Quarter 1 January - March 2008
Quarter 4 October - December 2007
Quarter 2 April - June 2007
Quarter 1 January - March 2007
Quarter 2 April - June 2006
Quarter 1 January - March 2006
Quarter 4 October - December 2005
Quarter 3 July - September 2005
Tax Office sounds warning on 8 types of super schemes

The Australian Taxation Office has earmarked a number of superannuation and SMSF schemes it says are under additional scrutiny for their ability to enable taxpayers to evade laws around superannuation and tax rules.



       


 


There are a number of warning signs associated with illegal super schemes that Australians interested in SMSFs must be aware of.


Taking part in an illegal super scheme could see you penalised financially, disqualified from being a trustee and having to wind up your SMSF, or even spending time behind bars.  


The Australian Taxation Office has now highlighted eight separate types of superannuation schemes that are attracting its attention for all the wrong reasons. These are:


Related-party property development ventures


While an SMSF can invest directly or indirectly in property development ventures, the Tax Office said “extreme care must be taken”.


Some arrangements can give rise to significant income tax and superannuation regulatory risks, such as the potential application of the non-arm’s length income provisions and breaches of regulatory rules about related-party transactions.


Non-concessional cap manipulation


Non-concessional cap manipulation sees individuals and some SMSF members “deliberately exceed their non-concessional contributions cap with a view to manipulating the taxable and non-taxable components of their superannuation account balances”.


Granting legal life interest over commercial property to SMSFs


This is done by SMSF members or other related entities to divert rental income so it can be taxed at a lower rate without full ownership of the property ever transferring to the SMSF.


Dividend stripping


In this scenario, shareholders in a private company transfer ownership of their shares to a related SMSF so that the company can pay franked dividends to the SMSF with the purpose of stripping profits from the company in tax-free form.


Some limited recourse borrowing arrangements (LRBAs)


Where these arrangements aren’t consistent with a genuine arm’s length dealing.


Personal services income


Where an individual — with an SMSF often in pension phase — diverts income earned from personal services to the SMSF so it is concessionally taxed or treated as exempt from tax.


 


The next two arrangements being monitored by the ATO relate to the new super caps and restrictions that apply as a result of the super changes that came into effect on 1 July 2017:



Improper use of multiple SMSFs


The ATO said having multiple SMSFs does not ordinarily raise compliance issues, but the establishment of additional SMSFs intended to manipulate tax outcomes would.


The example provided was a switching of each respective fund between accumulation and retirement phases.


Inappropriate use of reserves


In the past, many existing reserves “arose legitimately from legacy pensions that are no longer available”, the Tax Office has conceded.


However, there are now very limited appropriate circumstances where new reserves would be established and maintained in SMSFs.


Structures using reserves designed to bypass super balance and transfer balance cap measures will attract scrutiny.


 


To prevent falling prey to foul play and super schemes that are illegal, the ATO has asked taxpayers to make sure they are receiving ethical professional advice when undertaking retirement planning.


It emphasised the importance of seeking a second opinion from a trusted and reputable expert, especially where in doubt.


 


 


Grace Ormsby 
25 November 2019 
accountantsdaily.com.au


 




22nd-December-2019