Phone: (03) 9563 4688

Email: office@aubreypaton.com.au

Address: 17D Chester Street, Oakleigh VIC 3166

Latest Accounting News
Hot Issues
Fringe Benefits Tax (FBT): employees’ private use of vehicles
ATO to contact clients over bank details
ATO claws back $850m in unpaid SG in FY 17-18
Appetite for property in SMSFs shows signs of life despite tough market
Superannuation gender gap narrowing, research shows
Identification numbers for directors
How financial advice helps create wealth.
Australia's vital statistics
Unlocking equity crowdfunding in Australia
$20m boost for SME clients looking to exporting
Work-Related Expenses
ATO updates crypto guidance
ATO zones in on hundreds of newly created reserves
Senate passes $20,000 instant asset write-off extension
Victorian Vacant Property Tax
Director Penalty Notices
ATO set to pounce on undisclosed income streams
In case you missed it – The company tax Bill that did pass Parliament.
GST spotlight headed to smaller end of town
Superannuation Amnesty – Maybe! Maybe Not!
ATO drills in car-sharing focus this tax time
What is Bankruptcy?
Update of Australia's vital statistics
ATO speaks on risk factors, surveillance triggers for FY19
ATO’s corporate residency guidance cops backlash
ATO dispels top tax time myths to clients as clampdown rolls out
Tools for budgeting, cash flow, Super and more ….
Guidance for SMSFs on transfer balance reporting
Articles archive
Quarter 3 July - September 2018
Quarter 2 April - June 2018
Quarter 1 January - March 2018
Quarter 4 October - December 2017
Quarter 3 July - September 2017
Quarter 2 April - June 2017
Quarter 1 January - March 2017
Quarter 4 October - December 2016
Quarter 3 July - September 2016
Quarter 2 April - June 2016
Quarter 1 January - March 2016
Quarter 4 October - December 2015
Quarter 3 July - September 2015
Quarter 2 April - June 2015
Quarter 1 January - March 2015
Quarter 4 October - December 2014
Quarter 3 July - September 2014
Quarter 2 April - June 2014
Quarter 1 January - March 2014
Quarter 4 October - December 2013
Quarter 3 July - September 2013
Quarter 2 April - June 2013
Quarter 1 January - March 2013
Quarter 4 October - December 2012
Quarter 3 July - September 2012
Quarter 2 April - June 2012
Quarter 1 January - March 2012
Quarter 4 October - December 2011
Quarter 3 July - September 2011
Quarter 2 April - June 2011
Quarter 1 January - March 2011
Quarter 4 October - December 2010
Quarter 3 July - September 2010
Quarter 2 April - June 2010
Quarter 1 January - March 2010
Quarter 4 October - December 2009
Quarter 3 July - September 2009
Quarter 2 April - June 2009
Quarter 1 January - March 2009
Quarter 4 October - December 2008
Quarter 3 July - September 2008
Quarter 2 April - June 2008
Quarter 1 January - March 2008
Quarter 4 October - December 2007
Quarter 2 April - June 2007
Quarter 1 January - March 2007
Quarter 2 April - June 2006
Quarter 1 January - March 2006
Quarter 4 October - December 2005
Quarter 3 July - September 2005
Quarter 4 of 2013
Articles
Penalty for unsubstantiated work-related deduction claims
Death, divorce, relationships and complications
Buying a Property
Plumbers were full-time casuals, not contractors
Resources on our site to help you, your family and/or your business.
Merry Christmas to all our clients, your staff, family and friends.
Residency requirement for CGT home exemption failed
Residency Tested Again - Taxpayer Loses
Parent liable to CGT on half-share of townhouse
ATO information on everyday issues.
Victorian Fire Services Property Levy
Penalty for unsubstantiated work-related deduction claims

 

The AAT has recently affirmed a decision of the Tax Commissioner to impose a penalty on an individual equal to 50 per cent of the tax shortfall .....


... amount arising from deduction claims for work-related expenses that were unsubstantiated.

 

 

 


     

 

The taxpayer made claims as a car salesman for work-related expenses of $30,000 plus for several years.  The Tax Commissioner determined that most of the claims were unsubstantiated and imposed a penalty of approximately $6,000, representing 50 per cent of the tax shortfall of the 2012 year.

The individual did not dispute that the claims were unsubstantiated, but argued that the penalty was severe and that he was unable to pay all of the penalty.  The AAT noted, among other things, that the individual did not retain invoices or receipts, or provide satisfactory evidence to substantiate the claims.  The AAT was of the view that the individual's conduct was more serious than mere failure to take reasonable care, and held that the penalty imposed was appropriate.

It is not clear if the other years were also subject to penalties – if not the taxpayer may have got off lightly!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



17th-December-2013